From - Wed Apr 11 16:40:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3BEePpv033410 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HbdyD-0005PR-4Q for metafont@ens.fr; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:38:49 +0200 Received: from 217.201.17.37 ([217.201.17.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:38:49 +0200 Received: from rodolfo.medina by 217.201.17.37 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:38:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: metafont@ens.fr From: Rodolfo Medina Subject: Editing CM source files Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:36:14 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.201.17.37 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:esXR7nxPYw1BtT0Vq4bIZ6dXH1A= Sender: news X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Hi. I wanted to edit cmr12.mf to see what happens. So I copied the original file into a work directory, changed its name and ran metafont on it: $ mf \mode=localfont; input my-cmr12 $ gftopk my-cmr12.2602gf . Then, in my-file.tex I put: \font\myfont=my-cmr12 \myfont Hallo \vfill\eject\end , and then I do: $ tex my-file . Now, the changes I do in my-cmr12.mf seem to produce no effect at all in the my-file.dvi output file. For example, if I change the 12pt size into 50pt, in dvi file the characters are always 12pt small. Can anyone explain why? What am I missing? Please pardon the basicness of the question. Thanks, Rodolfo From - Wed Apr 11 17:20:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from tmailer.gwdg.de (tmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.23]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3BFKALa054119 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5]) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HbecD-0003eM-6f; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:09 +0200 Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu05.gwdg.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id l3BFK3bA024887; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (lfinsto1@localhost) by gwdu05.gwdg.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id l3BFK3eX024883; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:03 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu05.gwdg.de: lfinsto1 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Laurence Finston To: Rodolfo Medina cc: metafont@ens.fr Subject: Re: [metafont] Editing CM source files In-Reply-To: <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:20:15 +0200 (CEST) On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > > I wanted to edit cmr12.mf to see what happens. > So I copied the original file into a work directory, changed its name and ran > metafont on it: > > $ mf > \mode=localfont; input my-cmr12 > > $ gftopk my-cmr12.2602gf > I have done this sort of thing before, but it's been quite awhile. Put this or something like it at the top of my-cmr12. You don't need to put it in the command line: localfont:=ljfour; mode:=localfont; mode_setup; Make sure it doesn't reset `mode' afterwards. `ljfour' is defined on my system. The alternative is `cx'. These values are defined in some file or other that's part of your METAFONT installation. They refer to device resolutions. You may have to use `grep' to find them, unless someone else here knows off-hand. On my system, `ljfour' is for 600 dpi (dots per inch) fonts and `cx' is for 300 dpi. 300 dpi is probably as obsolete as the horse-and-buggy. 2602 is the resolution for proofsheets. I believe the utility for examining them is called `gftodvi'. They look like the illustrations in _The METAFONTbook_. > . Then, in my-file.tex I put: > > \font\myfont=my-cmr12 > > \myfont > > Hallo > > \vfill\eject\end > > , and then I do: > > $ tex my-file > If you succeed in generating `my-cmr12.300gf' and converting it to `my-cmr12.300pk', (or `my-cmr12.600gf' and `my-cmr12.600pk'), it seems to me that this should work. You could also add `gf', `pk', `tfm', and `src' (source) subdirectories in your current directory and put the various files into the appropriate subdirectories. I believe the only ones that are needed are the `tfm' and `pk' files, unless you try to load the font at a different size and/or magnification and `Kpathsea' needs to try to generate it. You could also put the fonts in another directory where Kpathsea, MF, and/or TeX can find it. One used to use a `texmf.cnf' file for this purpose. I believe this still works on my system, but this information may also be out-of-date. Don't lose heart. What you want to do is possible, and shouldn't even be too difficult. If necessary, I'll dust off my old files and give it a try. Laurence Finston From - Wed Apr 11 17:22:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from tmailer.gwdg.de (tmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.23]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3BFMqZX055437 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de ([134.76.8.5]) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Hbeem-0004iQ-JR; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:48 +0200 Received: from gwdu05.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu05.gwdg.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id l3BFMkU4024922; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:48 +0200 Received: from localhost (lfinsto1@localhost) by gwdu05.gwdg.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id l3BFMkor024919; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:46 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu05.gwdg.de: lfinsto1 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Laurence Finston To: Rodolfo Medina cc: metafont@ens.fr Subject: Re: [metafont] Editing CM source files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:22:57 +0200 (CEST) On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Laurence Finston wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > > Make sure it doesn't reset `mode' afterwards. > Actually, I think this would only matter if you called `mode_setup' again. Laurence From - Wed Apr 11 17:53:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3BFrjlO071884 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:53:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from mole.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.8.151]) by mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1Hbf8j-0000v0-00; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:53:45 +0100 Received: from mole.cl.cam.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mole.cl.cam.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9385B4A19A; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:53:45 +0100 (BST) To: Rodolfo Medina cc: metafont@ens.fr Subject: Re: [metafont] Editing CM source files In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:36:14 +0200. <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.2; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 21.3.1 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:53:45 +0100 Message-ID: <3719.1176306825@mole.cl.cam.ac.uk> From: Robin Fairbairns X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:53:51 +0200 (CEST) Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I wanted to edit cmr12.mf to see what happens. is this the third, or only the second time i've read this post? > So I copied the original file into a work directory, changed its name and ran > metafont on it: > > $ mf > \mode=localfont; input my-cmr12 > > $ gftopk my-cmr12.2602gf if you've got a .2602gf, your mf ran in proof mode; it's unlikely that any tex run is going to pick that up. > . Then, in my-file.tex I put: > > \font\myfont=my-cmr12 > > \myfont > > Hallo > > \vfill\eject\end > > , and then I do: > > $ tex my-file > > . Now, the changes I do in my-cmr12.mf seem to produce no effect at > all in the my-file.dvi output file. For example, if I change the 12pt > size into 50pt, in dvi file the characters are always 12pt small. presumably because tex and xdvi/dvips couldn't find your font, and ran maketextfm or maketexpk (respectively) and used the output of that. maketex* files aren't like makefiles: they don't even get called if the font source changes. so, you need to sort out your mode_setup; i think someone else has already told you that. i think the faq covers mode_setup. From - Sun Apr 15 17:44:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3FFiMbv026033 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hd6tk-0002uL-Af for metafont@ens.fr; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:16 +0200 Received: from 217.201.8.65 ([217.201.8.65]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:16 +0200 Received: from rodolfo.medina by 217.201.8.65 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:16 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: metafont@ens.fr From: Rodolfo Medina Subject: Re: [metafont] Editing CM source files Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:28 +0200 Lines: 59 Message-ID: <87647xfxr7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87lkgzt1up.fsf@gmail.com> <200704112226.l3BMQ20a017546@comp.uark.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.201.8.65 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8lt0gycSoSJbcw8+HEjWdRE6h6Q= Sender: news X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Rodolfo Medina wrote: >>I wanted to edit cmr12.mf to see what happens. >>So I copied the original file into a work directory, changed its name and ran >>metafont on it: >> >> $ mf >> \mode=localfont; input my-cmr12 >> >> $ gftopk my-cmr12.2602gf Dan Luecking writes: > If localfont is a known mode, it should NOT produce a .2602gf > file. It should instead produce a .300gf or .600gf (or even > .1200gf) file. You should run gftopk on that NEW GF FILE. Yes, it was my mistake: I did: `$ gftopk my-cmr12.600gf', as you say. Rodolfo: >>Now, the changes I do in my-cmr12.mf seem to produce no effect at all in the >>my-file.dvi output file. For example, if I change the 12pt size into 50pt, in >>dvi file the characters are always 12pt small. Dan: > How do you change the size? Normally you would do this by changing > all the size parameters defined in cmr12.mf. Changing the font_size > command would have no effect. All it does is set the value of the > parameter designsize. > > [...] > > If you would like to test whether changes are occuring, you should > try changing some parameter that has a visible effect, such as > bar_height#, body_height# or slant. In my-cmr12.mf I changed the line: body_height#:=324/36pt#; % height of tallest characters into: body_height#:=3240/36pt#; % height of tallest characters , with no effect either. Any other hint? Thanks, Rodolfo From - Sun Apr 15 19:51:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with SMTP id l3FHpeR3070750 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:51:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 691 invoked by uid 0); 15 Apr 2007 17:51:40 -0000 Received: from 82.83.177.4 by www131.gmx.net with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:51:40 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:51:40 +0200 From: "Matthias Pospiech" Message-ID: <20070415175140.219530@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Howto Unsubscribe To: metafont@ens.fr X-Authenticated: #2798017 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange) X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/aG/Uc+7TaY3X+btBCVQ2Zsbb/GXtEUYM98lkHYZ sJGx+hINOhJ+UOZWZ4TM1ZpA8u9mQXSGyjxQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GMX-UID: FFERcoMnf2IsPZbYRmxoPK14dWxlc9bv X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:51:46 +0200 (CEST) I got some email lately from this list and would like to know how to unsubscribe. Matthias Pospiech -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail From - Mon Apr 16 13:24:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3GBO7SD098268 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:24:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so954093ugs for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:24:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=Qm6WFFZQEgOYFkspAnLQZgWcDR5k5q+iWCgDd1+QP8hwwsPE5FuKWchL1spZjKcngI8JhSCeTNkbPr3hjq1OM0xfQZAytOJLvtG8zhnl9SOBbiKrGBFrdX3zV3u77lQEgeseUijKvLk7HdaFuwrt3WKCqEpCsxocg/tJ2QXghGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=k0ndxl3upUc2GuxnuamCf35a0AoUnBfY+kfjV5SwN6pRDpnW1B7oEUJLoZKg7jqhy2ZklFqL8u/rG6PUvQvy3ZGx4lWg7YB5n5olWYsaI3b3QmSu1SqYk2cYBGg2sjZWbA5YWXJSkCG/MtPJs9GmJjDtMBV4JKrxSNADatF1coE= Received: by 10.82.163.13 with SMTP id l13mr3271798bue.1176722647737; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [217.201.26.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9sm19626muf.2007.04.16.04.24.01; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:24:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Rodolfo Medina To: "Matthias Pospiech" Cc: metafont@ens.fr Subject: Re: [metafont] Howto Unsubscribe References: <20070415175140.219530@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:24:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070415175140.219530@gmx.net> (Matthias Pospiech's message of "Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:51:40 +0200") Message-ID: <87odloblzz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:24:13 +0200 (CEST) "Matthias Pospiech" writes: > I got some email lately from this list and would like to know how to > unsubscribe. I think you should send a message to `sympa@ens.fr' with no subject and `unsubscribe metafont' as body. Rodolfo From - Fri Apr 27 00:23:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3QMNFZ2056146 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:23:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:36704 helo=[10.10.0.6]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1HhB7k-000CzJ-Ml; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:03:32 +0000 Message-ID: <463113A4.7020003@elvenkind.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:03:32 +0200 From: Taco Hoekwater User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: metapost@tug.org, ntg-context@ntg.nl, metafont@ens.fr, tex-implementors@tug.org Subject: MetaPost 1.000 announcement Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Delayed for 01:19:43 by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:23:21 +0200 (CEST) The MetaPost team is happy to announce a new release of MetaPost: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MetaPost 1.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The sources and a win32 package can be downloaded immediately from https://foudnry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost/ The source package should compile normally on all systems that are capable of compiling a modern web2c-based TeX distribution. The win32 package is intended for texlive or a similar web2c-based installation, and has been tested only with TeXLive 2007. These executables will *not* work for miktex, sorry. Of course, we welcome any comments (either good or bad) that you may have. Simply replying to this message is fine, but see the bottom of the message for a more formal way to report bugs and feature requests. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- What is new in version 1.000: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * The use of DSC (document structuring) comments has been been cleaned up, thanks to comments by Michail Vidiassov. * By setting prologues to 2 or 3, you can ask MetaPost to reencode and include the used labels fonts in the output, thus creating proper Encapsulated PostScript files even if labels are present. * Support for greyscale and cmykcolor models is added. * The new drawing options "withprescript" and withpostscript" allow the user to attach PostSCript special text to a specific drawing object. * Setting the new internal "mpprocset" to 1 will make MetaPost create a somewhat extended preamble that defines shortcuts for the postscript commands (e..g "l" instead of "lineto"). For big images, this can help shrink the output a bit. * The pool file is now integrated in the executable, so there is not separate 'mp.pool' anymore, except at build time. * Groff support is redone, and dmp now uses kpathsea searching. Groff related changes are thanks to the efforts of Werner Lemberg and Michail Vidiassov * makempx is now a compiled executable on all systems, thank you Akira Kakuto * The error for 'special's longer then 255 characters is removed, so specials can now be of any length. * There is new turningnumber implementation that attempts to find the mathematically correct "turningnumber" of a path. The formulae are derived from a mailinglist discussion between (especially) Dan Luecking and Giuseppe Bilotta. * The manual is updated and modernized. It is currently maintained by Stephan Hennig and Troy Henderson. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Legal notice / license / bug reports ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MetaPost is a system for producing graphics developed by John Hobby at AT&T, based on Donald Knuth's Metafont. The MetaPost home page is http://tug.org/metapost. MetaPost and related programs are in the public domain. The MetaPost development project is currently hosted at Supelec, https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost; please report bugs and request enhancements through there if possible. Alternatively, you can reach us through the mailing list as well. Have fun! Taco Hoekwater, for the MetaPost team, April 26, 2007 From - Fri Apr 27 09:32:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on di.ens.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id l3R7Vsdp087496 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:31:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:60112 helo=[10.10.0.6]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1HhJvQ-0004li-Gi; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:27:24 +0000 Message-ID: <463197CC.3010501@elvenkind.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:27:24 +0200 From: Taco Hoekwater User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephan Hennig CC: metapost@tug.org, ntg-context@ntg.nl, metafont@ens.fr, tex-implementors@tug.org Subject: Re: [metapost] MetaPost 1.000 announcement References: <463113A4.7020003@elvenkind.com> <4631349C.8030600@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <4631349C.8030600@arcor.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Delayed for 01:04:29 by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Stephan Hennig wrote: > Taco Hoekwater schrieb: > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> What is new in version 1.000: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * The output file naming scheme is configurable. Right. I overlooked it (because it was already in 'CHANGES' for 0.920) > (If this hasn't been removed as a last minute change. :) No,no. Best wishes, Taco (and sorry about that typo in the supelec URL)